This Is Not A Pipe

Posted by Ace on March 30th, 2010 filed in artwork, letters from Ace, truisms

Drawing is stupid.

OK, maybe stupid is the wrong word, in a global sense.  There must have been a point (or a long stretch) in human history where the ability to create two-dimensional line representations of three-dimensional objects seemed nothing short of miraculous.  And that can still be the case.  I’ve stood in front of classrooms full of fidgety schoolchildren who became transfixed, just bowled over by the fact that I could conjure up an army of their favorite cartoon characters with a piece of chalk and a few quick strokes of my arm.  That’s gratifying.

On the other hand, though, here’s a sketch I did sitting at the counter of a diner, while I was waiting for Gloria’s engine to be repaired:

Now, what the hell good is that?   It isn’t a terribly accurate representation of what the cup and saucer and spoon really looked like over those moments (which I guess you’ll just have to take my word for, being as how I was there, and you weren’t.)  It serves as a mnemonic for me of what it was like to sit at that counter at that moment, in front of that cup of coffee, but the greater part of that experience has nothing to do with the drawing (or the coffee) and is not communicated by it in any way:  you can’t divine by looking at that drawing what the smell and taste of the french fries with mayo that were sitting right next to it were like, or how I was starting to feel washed out because I was about to come down with bronchitis, or perceive what the head waitress sounded like bitching out the other waitresses about how the coffee in the pot was too old, or get the general sense of daily life’s minutiae that I did as old men ambled up and took seats on other side of me, placing small variations on the same orders they’d no doubt placed a hundred times before.  You can’t even really tell too much about the objects the drawing is supposed to represent, other than some bare suggestion of their physical arrangement:  whether the cup and saucer were white or beige;  whether the spoon was clean or dirty;  whether the coffee is hot or cold, flavored or not, or if it even is coffee.  If you think you can, it’s because you’re bringing your own experience to it;  reaching into your internal database of coffee-china-warm-beverage-related associations and calling them up in your own head, at the drawing’s instigation.

I can type this:

COFFEE ON A DINER COUNTER

…and it does the same thing.  With the same efficacy.  And that only took me two seconds.  The drawing took 10 minutes.  Maybe more.

On the third hand, I kinda dug these creamers:


6 Responses to “This Is Not A Pipe”

  1. Neuro Says:

    There’s a lot I could say about this; feel like most of my college education aimed me at responding to this. But I’m having kind of a “bad brain day” today, so not sure I should attempt it now, so I’ll try it later or tomorrow.

  2. Church Says:

    My first reaction is that your drawings tell us about your subject- but we find them fascinating because what they say about you.
    My second thought is that you, as the artist might want to avoid just that.

  3. Neuro Says:

    I tried a response and it was too verbose. The encapsulation, though, is: my guess is that brain circuits respond with a nice blast of dopamine to 1) imperfect things, 2) the workings of other humans’ minds (including skill), and 3) certain geometric shapes or patterns (and more if they are exaggerated). Drawing can often satisfy all of those circuits better than mere words or photographs usually can, and get us our dopamine fixes. So that’s what it’s good for.

    Now war–what is it good for? Absolutely nothing. Say it again.

  4. Ace Says:

    Little fuzzy on number 1 there. Are you saying that if I ever somehow finally intuit a Platonic Form, I can expect it to be kind of unsatisfying, because there won’t be any dopamine involved? ;)

  5. Neuro Says:

    My guess is there is also a circuit that appreciates perfection, so if you were to see that Platonic Form, you’d get a nice dopamine spritz from that, too. We like things that are either rough-in-the-right-way or perfect, but not so much things in-between. (“Then how do you explain the success of K-Mart,” you ask? Good question. Got me there.)

    This bimodal appreciation thing is akin to the idea of the “uncanny valley”, in which robots that look nothing like humans don’t freak us out, or ones that look precisely like humans don’t freak us out, but ones in the middle, that look eerily close to humans but are sort of “off” then really freak us out.

  6. The Struggle for Relevance | Tales of the Interregnum Says:

    […] most of my art time Photoshopping pictures I take of Second Life and Uru, and none drawing. My disenchantment with drawing is not a terribly well-kept secret; it’s something I’ve discussed privately with […]